Find two resources appropriate for a literature review from your assigned research tool.
In selecting the citations your team of two will present to the class, consider the scholarly nature of the source including:
Source:
Harris, R. (2010, November 22). Evaluating Internet research sources. Retrieved from: http://www.virtualsalt.com/evaluating-internet-research-sources/
Also consider and be prepared to present to the class:
To find scholarly materials on your topic, you will need to understand the thesauri for the different databases you will be searching. You will also need to develop a list of terms and keywords that you use to search databases looking for new materials to add to your literature review.
Let's begin with a sample topic:
Safety policies in K-12 schools, specifically relating to weapons
What are the concepts represented in this topic?
Weapons
Policies
K-12 schools
Safety
What are some synonyms that might be used in books, articles, presentations, dissertations, and reports that address each of the facets of this research topic?
Weapons |
Policies |
K-12 schools |
Safety |
gun* |
polic* |
school* |
violence |
toy gun* |
educational polic* |
public school* |
school safety |
knive* |
zero tolerance policy |
middle school* |
child safety |
rifle* |
school polic* |
secondary school* |
accident* |
firearm* |
discipline polic* |
elementary school* |
school security |
bomb* |
|
high school* |
Use the Thesaurus of each database to identify the appropriate "controlled vocabulary" for that database. Add these terms to your list. Try searching with different combinations of terms.
When you find a relevant source, examine the subject descriptors or terms that have been applied to that source. Add any new terms you find to your list. Use the terms to search by keyword in the databases, on the web, and elsewhere to identify new materials. Always review the references on each relevant item to identify other materials you should obtain.
Peer-Reviewed Journals employ an editorial board, editor, and system of academic reviewers who assess the quality of the research and contribution to the discipline of submitted articles and recommend to the editor whether the article should be accepted/published as is, returned for minor revisions, or rejected. Rejections might include recommendations of other journals for which the article might be a better fit. Normally, the system is double-blind -the author does not know the identify of the reviewer and the reviewer does not know the identity of the author.
Educational Researcher is an example of a peer-reveiwed journal in the field of education. You can determine if a journal is peer-reviewed by examining an issue of the journal or the website for the publisher. Peer-reviewed journals have an editor, an editorial board of academics from major university, author instructions, criteria for selection, description of the scope of the journal, and other indications that the process of identifying which articles will be published is based on fairness and quality. The highest quality journals have high impact factors in Thomson-Reuters' Journal Citation Reports, Scopus, and other comparative tools.
Chronicle of Higher Education is an example of a secondary or trade journal that is important in higher education as a source of current information on topics of interest to the field.
Journals contain a variety of types of articles including original research, opinion, editorial, discussion, meta-analysis, and review articles.
Several journals in the field of education contain review articles: